Introduction: With a prototype of an ozone system, it is possible to reduce the microbiological load in hospital clothing. Methods: 6 samples were used, one control and another five subjected to different processes. Results: Five different processes, the use of ozone does reduce the microbiological load, being favorable for the disinfection of them; however, the fact of washing clothes with detergent and then rinsing them with ozone water ensures the reduction of the pathogenic load, bringing it to zero. Conclusion: Hospital linen washing processes ensure the reduction of the pathogenic load with the use of an ozone washing machine in rinsing.
Health centers are required to comply with protocols established by the Ministry of Health of Peru (MINSA)[1], for the treatment of hospital linen. The directorial resolutions agree on three types of risks: high, medium, and low, and do not show anything related to the use of Ozone (O3). Calvo (2004) found that the use of ozone allows water savings in laundries in the textile industry. Korol et al. (1995) determined that ozone was a better disinfectant than chlorine. A prototype of an ozone system was built to test whether the microbiological load on laundry clothes at the San Francisco health center is reduced, thanks to funding from the Jorge Basadre Grohmann National University (UNJBG) in the city of Tacna. As these results are proven, then, the possibility of reducing occupational risks increases, as well as continuing research, since clothing that can be used outside the protocol could be the origin of cross-infection. (National Maternal and Perinatal Institute, 2021) (Hospital de Emergencias José Casimiro Ulloa, 2021) (Hospital Huaycan, 2023) (EsSalud, 2014)
6 samples of used hospital clothing were collected, and each one was subjected to different disinfection methods. The samples are identified as follows. The control sample = 0; Sample 1 = 1; Sample 2 = 2; Sample 3 = 3, Sample 4 = 4; Sample 5 = 5.
If the sample has not yet undergone any treatment, the letter "A" is added, and if it has already undergone the disinfection treatment, then the letter "D" is added.
2 samples were taken per sample: before and after treatment.
In each sampling, the garment was spread on a table sanitized with 70° alcohol and approximately 10 cm x 10 cm was delimited to drag the swab moistened with microbiological conservation water (peptonated water) on the surface of the garment the same number of times vertically, horizontally, diagonally to the left and diagonally to the right and then the swab was placed in the vial containing the conservation water. The vial was closed, labeled, and prepared to send to the laboratory.
Once the prototype was located, the described methodology was executed.
Figure 1: Prototype of an ozone washing machine
Table 1: Laboratory Results
|
SHOW CONTROL |
|||
|
CFU/surface BEFORE |
CFU/surface AFTER |
% Reduction |
|
|
Count of Viable Aerobes Mesophiles |
22100000 |
160 |
99.99927602 |
|
Total Coliform Count |
0 |
0 |
- |
|
Staphylococcal Coagulase Count Positive |
0 |
0 |
- |
|
Pseudomonas sp. count |
0 |
0 |
- |
|
Filamentous and Yeasant Fungal Count |
10 |
10 |
0 |
|
SAMPLE 1 |
|||
|
CFU/surface BEFORE |
CFU/surface AFTER |
% Reduction |
|
|
Count of Viable Aerobes Mesophiles |
134000000 |
0 |
100 |
|
Total Coliform Count |
0 |
0 |
- |
|
Staphylococcal Coagulase Count Positive |
1140 |
0 |
100 |
|
Pseudomonas sp. count |
0 |
0 |
- |
|
Filamentous and Yeasant Fungal Count |
650 |
0 |
100 |
|
SAMPLE 2 |
|||
|
CFU/surface BEFORE |
CFU/surface AFTER |
% Reduction |
|
|
Count of Viable Aerobes Mesophiles |
450000 |
0 |
100 |
|
Total Coliform Count |
0 |
0 |
- |
|
Staphylococcal Coagulase Count Positive |
0 |
0 |
- |
|
Pseudomonas sp. count |
270000 |
0 |
100 |
|
Filamentous and Yeasant Fungal Count |
70 |
0 |
100 |
|
SAMPLE 3 |
|||
|
CFU/surface BEFORE |
CFU/surface AFTER |
% Reduction |
|
|
Count of Viable Aerobes Mesophiles |
430000000 |
330 |
99.99992326 |
|
Total Coliform Count |
0 |
0 |
- |
|
Staphylococcal Coagulase Count Positive |
0 |
0 |
- |
|
Pseudomonas sp. count |
390000000 |
0 |
100 |
|
Filamentous and Yeasant Fungal Count |
0 |
0 |
- |
|
SAMPLE 4 |
|||
|
CFU/surface BEFORE |
CFU/surface AFTER |
% Reduction |
|
|
Count of Viable Aerobes Mesophiles |
0 |
0 |
- |
|
Total Coliform Count |
0 |
0 |
- |
|
Staphylococcal Coagulase Count Positive |
0 |
0 |
- |
|
Pseudomonas sp. count |
12400 |
0 |
100 |
|
Filamentous and Yeasant Fungal Count |
1400 |
0 |
100 |
|
SAMPLE 5 |
|||
|
CFU/surface BEFORE |
CFU/surface AFTER |
% Reduction |
|
|
Count of Viable Aerobes Mesophiles |
1400 |
0 |
100 |
|
Total Coliform Count |
0 |
0 |
- |
|
Staphylococcal Coagulase Count Positive |
0 |
0 |
- |
|
Pseudomonas sp. count |
0 |
0 |
- |
|
Filamentous and Yeasant Fungal Count |
10 |
0 |
100 |
For the control sample, where washing was done on a regular basis, a good reduction was obtained. For aerobic mesophiles and no reduction for filamentous fungi.
In sample 1, a total reduction was obtained for aerobic mesophiles, staphylococci, and fungi. These were the only ones that were found.
In sample 2, the reduction was total for aerobic mesophiles, Pseudomonas, and filamentous fungi; these were the only ones that were found."
For sample 3, a total reduction was obtained for Pseudomonas, and a sufficient reduction of more than 5 logarithms for aerobic mesophiles; these were the only ones that were found.
For sample 4, the reduction was total for Pseudomonas and for total fungi; they were the only ones found.
For sample 5, the reduction was total for aerobic mesophiles and for filamentous fungi; these were the only ones found.
By applying ozone technologies, it is perfectly possible to disinfect hospital linen, the best being the one that considers washing with detergent, and with ozone, 100% disinfection is ensured.
Jorge Basadre Grohmann National University
San Francisco de Tacna Health Center