Present research analyzes the efficiency of administrative procedures in solving inter-departmental and inter-ministerial conflicts in the Government of India. Although the State can be represented as a single entity in terms of legal inquiry, in practice, the internal disputes have often initiated the long-term litigation processes because of the complexity of the procedures, the hierarchical obstinacy, and the lack of accountability, which translates into a significant number of unresolved cases among government departments. The paper follows the development of dispute-resolution frameworks between the aspirational National Litigation Policy, 2010, and the more structured 2025 Directive for Efficient and Effective Management of Litigation, examining how it will be designed, implemented, and will have an impact on an institution. The study recognizes barrier systems like knowledge gaps, risk-averse decision-making, and the bureaucratic culture as some systemic barriers that reinforce a trend of'compulsive litigation' using qualitative analysis of administrative practices, policy instruments, and LIMBS, which is a dispute-resolution system. It claims that the success of the recent reforms is conditioned by the structural capacity-building, better-defined accountability mechanisms, and institutional coordination, though the shifted tendencies toward proactive legal management and internal settlement are observed. The research, finally, suggests a useful administration dispute resolution structure to meet the goals of governance efficiency, ease of doing business, and other development goal Viksit Bharat 2047.